**Holding & Reasoning:** - *Issue 1:* The court held … because … (see ¶ X). - *Issue 2:* The court rejected … citing … (¶ Y).

Kaela stood again, voice steady. “Consent was digitally signed and witnessed by two independent mediators. The term ‘better’ referred to production value, not intensity. My client’s platform has since implemented a hard stop at Level 5.”

The decision places the evidentiary burden on the party accused of falsifying data, requiring concrete documentary proof rather than mere “lack of knowledge.”